David Cameron vs. Tory MEPs


David Cameron likes to talk the talk on issues such as the environment and gay rights, but this video shows with absolute clarity the huge gap between his warm words and the reality of the modern Conservative Party. The reality is simple - against gay rights, against progressive levy on bank profits, against tackling climate change...

Conservatives Lurch Right as Panic Sets In

Screen shot 2010-04-21 at 08.42.06

The Conservative confusion over how to deal with the rise of the Liberal Democrats and Nick Clegg is palpable. First, David Cameron hastily scraps a costly party political broadcast and now we see the Conservatives rolling out dog whistle right wing poster campaigns to shore up its base. 

This line could be taken straight from the 2005 Conservative campaign... 

Join us for LGBT Labour Manifesto Launch and Debate Watch Party!


This year's unprecedented TV debates between Gordon Brown, David Cameron and Nick Clegg will be crucial points in the general election campaign. They are also an opportunity for Labour to reach a wide audience and spread the message of economic action and a future fair for all.

To help spread that message and talk to people about the issues, join LGBT Labour,London Young Labour, LabourList, and the Young Fabians at Bar Soho in London on Thursday evening for a special debate watch party and campaigning session.

We'll be joined by Harriet Harman at 17.45 who'll be launching Labour's LGBT manifesto for the election, and then flyering the streets of Soho.

Later, we'll be calling voters using Labour's virtual phone bank - before sitting down to watch the debates together.

Please join us this Thursday, April 15th, from 6pm, for our special event.

Bar Soho, 23-25 Old Compton Street, London

18.00 - 18.30 Leafleting with Harriet Harman in Soho
18.30 - 18.45 LGBT Labour manifesto launch, with Harriet Harman
18.45 - 20.00 Phone Banking for Labour from Bar Soho
20.00 - 22.00 The Debate

For further details please contact Daryn McCombe (National Treasurer LGBT Labour) on 07729215260.

Flashback to 2008 Presidential Debates



“Good afternoon, I'm Chris Smith, I'm the Labour MP for Islington South and Finsbury and I'm gay"

First posted on LabourList.

Today, a comment like this from an elected official would pass without mention. We now live in a society of relative tolerance and acceptance and firm legal protections for gay men and women.

But when Lord Chris Smith stood at a rally in Rugby in 1984, 25 years ago this week, and came out as the first openly gay parliamentarian he was taking a leap into the unknown. As the then opposition spokesman on National Heritage, he had accepted an invitation to speak at a protest rally in Rugby to denounce the Conservative local council for abandoning a policy outlawing discrimination on the grounds of sexuality. His remarks received a five minute standing ovation from the crowd.

His bravery is remarkable given that at the time, gay men and women had no legal protection from harassment or discrimination: the hated Section 28 was still to come, fear of the newly prevalent HIV was escalating and media enmity against the LGBT community was rampant.

Since 1984, Lord Smith has continued as a trailblazer for gay men and women by becoming the first openly gay cabinet minister in 1997 and then one half of the first gay couple to receive a formal invitation to attend a Buckingham Palace reception.

In 2005, following Nelson Mandela’s announcement that his son had died of HIV, he became the first prominent political figure to admit to being HIV-positive.

Lord Chris Smith will be joining LGBT Labour for a special evening of celebrations to mark this anniversary and to raise money for Dorothy's List - the LGBT Labour Campaign Fund for openly-LGBT candidates standing for Labour at the coming General Election.

This celebration will be held at Ev Restaurant on Tuesday 1st December 2009 and we hope as many of you as possible will be able to join us, and Lord Smith, at the event to show our support and gratitude.

For further details and to purchase tickets please visit http://www.lgbtlabour.org.uk/25years or email dorothyslist@lgbtlabour.org.uk.


The logistics of primaries

There has been a lot of talk in the Labour Party lately about introducing some kind of primary election system to select parliamentary candidates. Althought I believe there are significant concerns around containing costs of selection procedures, I am generally supportive of the idea.

The Progress think tank has picked up on this issue with some zeal and is running an excellent campaign to push for their introduction in the Labour Party. Additionally, the Fabian Society outline some plans in its 'Change we Need' pamphlet, published early in 2009.

Although there is clearly much debate to be had around the details of primary elections, I believe the mood is shifting in the party to being overwhelmingly in favour of this new method of selection.

My question is simply this - if we decide we want them, how do we get them? The Conservatives seemed to test drive primaries relatively easily and with very little fuss; they should of course be commended for experimenting with new methods of empowering local voters. What I want to know is how would a Labour Party constituency go about introducing a primary selection procedure? Would there need to be substantial Labour Party rule changes? Could a local constituency just announce that they were planning to hold a selection in this manner?

If anyone knows, please tell me!

Obama is shortsighted to scrap missile defence

President Obama yesterday announced that the United States would scrap its planned deployment of a sophisticated missile defence system in Eastern Europe.

The move had been predicted for some time but the clumsy timing of the announcement was not missed by many, coming on September 17th, the 70th anniversary of the Soviet attack on Poland in 1939.

The move had been anticipated following President Obama’s letter to Dmitry Medvedev in early 2009 implied that a United States missile defence may be rendered unnecessary if Russia were to drop its intransigent opposition to sanctions against Iran. This was therefore simply further tangible action in ‘pushing the reset button’ on relations with Russia.

Alongside the aim of securing Russian cooperation in tackling the Iranian regime, there are numerous additional short term benefits to abandoning the so called ‘son of Star Wars system’ - a project that has been around since the Reagan presidency. Its cost in the middle of the global recession are difficult to justify and questions over its use in Americas conflict against the Taliban and insurgents within Iraq are just a few of the immediate concerns about the project.

However, the move by the White House seems short sighted and naïve when viewed in terms of the potential threats developing in the coming decades and the ever increasing significance of Eastern European allies in the face of Russian hegemony in the region.
The missile defence system was to consist of two key military installations in Poland and the Czech Republic. Both nations have long sought to unshackle themselves from Russian influence and establish themselves as secure states. It was this rationale that led Poland and the Czech Republic to sign deals with the United States immediately following the war between Russia and Georgia over the renegade republic South Ossetia.

Many ‘transatlanticist’ politicians in both nations invested vast amounts of political capital to support the programme, which developed during the height of the Bush administrations international unpopularity. To facilitate the agreement, politicians from both nations weathered strong domestic criticism. According to Foreign Policy Magazine around 70 percent of Czechs opposed the idea of hosting the radar system for the missile shield and the final treaty faced strong opposition in parliament.

The Czech and Polish governments saw the presence of a U.S. facility on their soil as a bulwark against an assertive Russia and an extension of US protection as a reward for their loyalty in the war on terrorism. Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski expressed his nations disappointment when, during a visit to Washington, he remarked that “we paid quite a political price for the agreement, both in terms of internal politics and in our relations with Russia” adding that he expected the United States to honour the commitment.

The change in policy will raise fresh doubts over American commitment to Eastern Europe; will the continent now feel able to resist pressure from the Kremlin, whether it is in military matters or in the supply of oil and gas? The jubilation felt in Moscow would certainly suggest that Russia may begin reasserting its authority in what President Dmitry Medvedev has described as a sphere of Russian “privileged interests”.

President Obama has claimed that the plans have been shelved due to the downgrading of the threat from Iran. However, an April report of the National Air and Space Intelligence Center noted that "with sufficient foreign assistance, Iran could develop and test an ICBM capable of reaching the United States by 2015."

Others have claimed that technological limitations trump any grand international plans, arguing that the weaponry is ineffective and untested. However, recent tests have shown that 37 of 46 intercepts have been successfully completed in realistic conditions since 2001 by land-mobile, sea-based and silo-based interceptors. After such results, there is no reason to believe the European elements would not work as planned.

The United States maintains that it is committed to ensuring that no nation feels the need to develop nuclear weapons. But this stand must be made from a position of strength. It must be made clear that resources spent on nuclear weapons and missiles will be wasted because the U.S. possesses both the means and the will to block them.

But above all the plans should not be abandoned simply to adapt to current military challenges. In 1999 the United States biggest security challenge was instability in the Balkans. Just a decade later it finds itself embroiled in conflict on numerous fronts against a hidden Islamic terrorist network. To delay or dismantle plans for a sophisticated defence system on the premise that current security threats do not warrant the investment is short sighted. If America is to maintain its military supremacy it needs to be able to defend itself against hostile states in the future. The idea that the military of the U.S. will remain preoccupied with rag tag militant groups rather than state-to-state conflicts in the foreseeable future does not stand up to historical precedent.

At best the change in policy will warm relations with Russia and squeeze Iranian ambitions. But at worst President Obama has denied America a strategic trump card that could have secured its military supremacy for decades to come, making it better able to contain hostile states in the future. Of course, only time will tell.

US condemned for pre-emptive use of Hillary Clinton against Pakistan



Reason number 1,376,981 to hate George W. Bush

He called Hillary fat!!
... that is according to a new 'tell all' book by former White House speech writer Matt Latimer, who claims the 43rd President was convinced the former First Lady would win the Democratic nomination, remarking 'Wait till her fat ass is sitting at this desk'.

Bush allegedly also slammed Barack Obama for being too inexperienced for the office and asked if Sarah Palin had served as 'Governor of Guam'

Full story here.

Bookmark and Share

Obama: He's a jackass

Mr. President throws his two cents in to the Kanyegate affair


Bookmark and Share

There now follows a party political broadcast...

I hate to admit it, but ConservativeHome have reeled out an excellent YouTube clip which (according to The Spectator) could form an extremely effective election theme for the Conservative party.


Bookmark and Share

Total Politics top blogs...

Total Politics magazine has today concluded its rather mammoth task of compiling the top political blogs in the United Kingdom.

As previously blogged, I was delighted to come in at a rather respectable 35th in the top 100 'left of centre' blogs. In addition, I was ranked 18th in the top 100 'Labour' blogs!

TP magazine today released its list of the top 100 blogs from every political leaning. I had been hoping to scrape in to the top 100, but just missed out - coming in at (a still excellent) 102nd place in the UK! Top 100 next year!!

I really was genuinely really pleased with this! So I want to say a HUGE thank you to everyone who took the time to submit a vote for my blog!

Bookmark and Share

Why Gordon Brown's apology matters

First posted at NextLeft and LabourList

Gordon Brown last night offered a heartfelt apology to World War II hero Alan Turing, who was forced to undergo chemical castration by the courts after a conviction for ‘gross indecency’ in 1952.

Turing famously worked at Bletchley Park during the Second World War to crack the German Enigma code machine, ultimately turning the tide of the conflict in favour of the Allies and potentially saving thousands of lives.

However, despite his invaluable work Turing was charged with gross indecency in 1952 after a relationship with another man became known to authorities. He was subsequently forced to be chemically castrated to avoid a prison sentence and suffered the indignity of having his government security clearance removed, thus barring him from continuing with his cryptographic consultancy for GCHQ.

Following his conviction and ensuing suffering, Turing took his own life on 8 June 1954 at the age of 41 – simply because he was gay.

This apology should remind us all that we must not forget the persecution and hatred faced by gay men and women just a generation ago. This apology is just a small way in which the Government can seek to atone for the suffering inflicted on so many by such barbaric laws.

It is also crucial that we refocus our attention on the international injustices still faced by so many simply due to their sexuality. With Panama decriminalising homosexuality in 2008 and Burundi for the first time in its history criminalising homosexuality in 2009, the world now counts 80 countries with State-sponsored homophobic laws: 72 countries and 3 entities (Turkish Cyprus, Gaza and Cook Islands) punish consenting adults with imprisonment, while 5 countries (Iran, Mauritania, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Yemen and parts of Nigeria and Somalia) punish them with the death penalty.

The apology has received a warm welcome not just in Britain, but across the world. It was particularly welcomed by Michael Cashman, MEP and Patron of LGBT Labour who has long been campaigning for the apology:

"The government's decision is a brilliant reminder of Labours commitment to equality and it's courage to put right the wrong decisions of the past. This news will be welcomed across the globe."

The Downing Street Petition had attracted some 30,805 people; the Prime Minister made the following statement in today’s Daily Telegraph:

“2009 has been a year of deep reflection - a chance for Britain, as a nation, to commemorate the profound debts we owe to those who came before. A unique combination of anniversaries and events have stirred in us that sense of pride and gratitude which characterise the British experience.

"Earlier this year I stood with Presidents Sarkozy and Obama to honour the service and the sacrifice of the heroes who stormed the beaches of Normandy 65 years ago. And just last week, we marked the 70 years which have passed since the British government declared its willingness to take up arms against Fascism and declared the outbreak of World War Two. So I am both pleased and proud that, thanks to a coalition of computer scientists, historians and LGBT activists, we have this year a chance to mark and celebrate another contribution to Britain’s fight against the darkness of dictatorship; that of code-breaker Alan Turing.

"Turing was a quite brilliant mathematician, most famous for his work on breaking the German Enigma codes. It is no exaggeration to say that, without his outstanding contribution, the history of World War Two could well have been very different. He truly was one of those individuals we can point to whose unique contribution helped to turn the tide of war. The debt of gratitude he is owed makes it all the more horrifying, therefore, that he was treated so inhumanely. In 1952, he was convicted of ‘gross indecency’ - in effect, tried for being gay. His sentence - and he was faced with the miserable choice of this or prison - was chemical castration by a series of injections of female hormones. He took his own life just two years later.

"Thousands of people have come together to demand justice for Alan Turing and recognition of the appalling way he was treated. While Turing was dealt with under the law of the time and we can’t put the clock back, his treatment was of course utterly unfair and I am pleased to have the chance to say how deeply sorry I and we all are for what happened to him. Alan and the many thousands of other gay men who were convicted as he was convicted under homophobic laws were treated terribly. Over the years millions more lived in fear of conviction.

"I am proud that those days are gone and that in the last 12 years this government has done so much to make life fairer and more equal for our LGBT community. This recognition of Alan’s status as one of Britain’s most famous victims of homophobia is another step towards equality and long overdue.

"But even more than that, Alan deserves recognition for his contribution to humankind. For those of us born after 1945, into a Europe which is united, democratic and at peace, it is hard to imagine that our continent was once the theatre of mankind’s darkest hour. It is difficult to believe that in living memory, people could become so consumed by hate - by anti-Semitism, by homophobia, by xenophobia and other murderous prejudices - that the gas chambers and crematoria became a piece of the European landscape as surely as the galleries and universities and concert halls which had marked out the European civilisation for hundreds of years. It is thanks to men and women who were totally committed to fighting fascism, people like Alan Turing, that the horrors of the Holocaust and of total war are part of Europe’s history and not Europe’s present.

"So on behalf of the British government, and all those who live freely thanks to Alan’s work I am very proud to say: we’re sorry, you deserved so much better."

Bookmark and Share

Gordon and the 'C' word



Bookmark and Share

Top 100 Left of Centre Blogs

Total Politics Magazine has today released its top 100 'left of centre' blogs. And Politicana came in at a very respectable 35th place! Thanks to everyone who voted!

Here is the complete list:

1 (1) Tom Harris MP

2 (2) Hopi Sen

3 (-) LabourList

4 (-) Alastair Campbell

5 (13) SNP Tactical Voting

6 (6) Luke Akehurst

7 (12) Harry's Place

8 (-) Next Left

9 (3) Stumbling & Mumbling

10 (27) The Daily (Maybe)

11 (59) Guerilla Welsh Fare

12 (17) A Very Public Sociologist

13 (10) Dave's Part

14 (15) Third Estate

15 (43) Two Doctors

16 (73) Blog Menai

17 (11) Sadie's Tavern

18 (-) Blackburn Labour

19 (74) Kerry McCarthy MP

20 (-) Malc in the Burgh

21 (-) Bickerstaffe Record

22 (14) Socialist Unity

23 (45) The F Word

24 (8) Tom Watson MP

25 (7) LabourHome

26 (-) Yapping Yousuf

27 (54) Penny Red

28 (-) Go Fourth!

29 (-) Duncan's Economic Blog

30 (39) Adam Price MP

31 (60) Welsh Ramblings

32 (93) Don Paskini

33 (-) Syniadau

34 (-) Subrosa

35 (-) Politicana

36 (-) Peter Cranie MEP

37 (72) Harpymarx

38 (-) Though Cowards Flinch

39 (47) Cynical Dragon

40 (23) Kezia Dugdale's Sopabox

41 (-) Plaid Wrecsam

42 (29) Lenin's Tomb

43 (-) Lallands Peat Worrior

44 (53) Tory Troll

45 (28) Stuart King

46 (71) Another Green World

47 (-) Bob from Brockley

48 (-) Pendroni

49 (25) Bob Piper

50 (36) Conor's Commentary

51 (-) Grumpy Spindoctor

52 (-) Splintered Sunrise

53 (84) Stroppy Blog

54 (-) Polemical Report

55 (-) Barkingside 21

56 (44) Rupa Huq

57 (20) Normblog

58 (-) John Rentoul

59 (-) Philobiblon

60 (18) Obsolete

61 (35) Bethan Jenkins AM

62 (-) Politics Cymru

63 (15) Paul Linford

64 (-) E8 Voice

65 (-) Left Outside

66 (-) Pickled Politics

67 (-) Borthlas

68 (-) Leanne Wood AM

69 (-) Sweet & Tender Hooligan

70 (80) Madam Miaow Says

71 (-) Dave Hill's London Blog

72 (85) Shiraz Socialist

73 (-) Green Ladywell

74 (38) Neil Clark

75 (41) Jane Is the One

76 (22) Theo Blackwell

77 (-) Rupert Read

78 (-) Gwilym Euros Roberts

79 (94) Oliver Kamm

80 (-) Touchstone Blog

81 (96) Macuaid

82 (90) Paul Flynn MP

83 (32) Chris Paul's Labour of Love

84 (-) Gaian Economics

85 (9) Ministry of Truth

86 (-) Cllr Tim's Blog

87 (19) Ordovicius

88 (-) Snowflake5

89 (-) Ruscombe Green

90 (-) Recess Monkey

91 (63) Labour and Capital

92 (-) This is My Truth

93 (-) Huw Lewis AM

94 (58) Grimmer up North

95 (75) The Exile

96 (-) Martin Bright

97 (-) Julian's Musings

98 (-) Lord Toby Harris

99 (-) Rebellion Sucks

100 (100) Jon Worth Euroblog

This list is the result of more than 1,500 people who voted in the Total Politics Annual Blog Poll during the second half of July.

All these lists, together with articles from leading blog commentators, will be published in the TOTAL POLITICS GUIDE TO POLITICAL BLOGGING, which will be published in mid September at £12.99.

Bookmark and Share

Why has Peter Hain posted on his Facebook that the Cabinet is split?

I don't know for sure if Peter Hain's Facebook page is actually Peter Hain. But if it is, why has he posted a Daily Mail article claiming that his views on the Gary McKinnon extradition have caused a Cabinet split??

I managed to grab this screen shot (above) of the post.

It has been well reported that his hostility to the extradition has caused friction with the Home Secretary, Alan Johnson - but to openly post that this is causing tensions within the cabinet is more than a little odd.

Bookmark and Share

WATCH LIVE: Palin officially stands down

Watch leave feed of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin officially leaving office and the swearing in of Lt. Gov. Sean Parnell here.

Bookmark and Share

Are the headlines turning against Cameron?

The No.10 media bunker will breath a sigh of relief when they check out tomorrows headlines. Cameron and the Conservatives come in for some negative coverage for the first time since..... well, for the first time in a while.

The Telegraph dedicates its lead column to Tory plans to introduce tolls on new roads. Considering that it was reported just days ago that the Conservatives approached Jeremy Clarkson to advise them on transport policy, this seems rather odd...
But it is the Daily Mail that really sticks the knife in to Cameron's latest plans to abolish the child tax credit for families that earn over £50,000 - or as they so delightfully put it - 'Cameron's Tax Raid on Middle Classes'.
Matthew Paris argued in his column on Saturday that Cameron should use the summer to announce unpopular policies that the Conservatives will be committed to when or if they form the next government.

Cameron's rhetoric has certainly shifted in the past few months and there is no longer any holding back when discussing the need for spending cuts after the next election. But will this blunt rhetoric begin to change the media narrative and relatively positive coverage that Cameron and the Conservatives have enjoyed?

With the mainstream media all but crowning the Conservatives as the next Government, will they begin to scrutinise their policies more throughly and question their sutiability to form the next government?

Bookmark and Share

We still believe



Bookmark and Share