10 November 2010
The result will track and measure the demographic and population changes across the country and will be an insight in to which states are increasing in size and the migration patterns that are causing these shifts.
This all sounds rather dull, right?
Well in one sense it is somewhat mind numbing, but as attention turns to the 2012 Presidential election it is worth bearing in mind that the population changes in each state will determine how Electoral College Votes are proportioned.
In 2008, Barack Obama won a landslide in the Electoral College, securing 365 Electoral College Votes (ECV) to John McCain's 173. This was done, in part, by winning handsomely in key swing states such as Florida (27 ECV), Virginia (13 ECV) and Ohio (20 ECV).
But with the 2012 election expected to be much closer than 2008 (GOP nominee dependent), the final margin of victory could be much narrower for the winning in candidate (George W. Bush beat Al Gore in 2000 by 271 to 266 ECV).
Early projections suggest that safe Democratic seats will be the big losers in the electoral college redistribution, with safe Republican seats gaining.
By these calculations, the Democrats would start the 2012 Presidential election with six fewer ECV from their safest seats than when they won in 2008. The Republicans would see a net gain of six. Key swing states such as Florida will see their importance increase with a potential gain of two ECV.
I think these early projections will mean several things, but primarily that the Latino vote in the United States will continue to grow in importance. Much of the population growth and demographic changes in states such as Florida has been driven by growing Latino communities. Barack Obama went to great lengths to court their vote in 2008 and won it comprehensively, beating the Republican ticket 67% - 31%. This crucial swing block (generally 'liberal' on issues such as immigration but often conservative on social issues due to catholic beliefs) could potentially be a saving grace for the Democrats and President Obama in 2012 given the continuing anti-immigration rhetoric of the Republican party which alienates many Hispanic voters.
Secondly, we can expect Florida to continue to increase it's importance as the must win state for any presidential candidate (Bill Clinton, in 1992, is the only candidate to have been elected President since 1960 - when Florida only had 10 ECV compared to its 27 today - without winning Florida). Florida could potentially be worth 29 ECV - more than Virgina and North Carolina combined and greater than the prize of Ohio or Pennsylvania.
It's a fairly safe bet to assume that any potential Republican Presidential candidate in 2012 will be closely watching his performance in the Senate with an eye to elevating him to the role of Vice Presidential pick. Indeed, Sarah Palin was an early endorser of his (and takes the credit for his eclipsing of Charlie Christ) and Mitt Romney, Mike Huckabee and Tim Pawlenty have all invested considerable amounts of time raising money and campaigning for him in the run up to his election.